Accurate navigation on a budget – Getting more out of your navigation systems with sensor fusion

As small observation and inspection class remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) become more and more capable, they have been able to take on a wider range of tasks, including inspection with HD video and sonar, object search and recovery, and ultrasonic testing. They can go places larger ROVs can’t and can even perform essential tasks previously only possible via larger, expensive ROVs.

herc_block_collecting_350pxBut one handicap of working with small ROVs, whether unmanned or autonomous, has been lack of accuracy navigating in the global navigation satellite system (GNSS)-denied environment of the ocean. Accurate three-dimensional navigation is essential for precise work such as station keeping, target tracking, and infrastructure maintenance. Large work-class ROVs have the advantage of having enough on-board power to support accurate and expensive north-seeking gyro navigation systems. The weight, price, and power requirements of such systems make them unworkable for observation class ROVs typically used for such jobs as scientific and environmental research, as well as infrastructure inspection.

Fortunately, there are navigation alternatives for smaller ROVs that makes them capable of precise navigation and control without significantly increasing their cost or power requirements.

The challenge of navigation with small ROVs

Working in the subsea environment, ROVs can’t use GNSS signals for navigation while in operation, due to the electromagnetic opacity of water. To compensate for the loss of GNSS, observation class ROVs are generally equipped with one or more acoustic navigation systems, which assist in a dead-reckoning position calculation from the last available surface GPS/GNSS waypoint.

Ultrashort baseline (USBL), Doppler velocity log (DVL), and long baseline survey (LBL) systems are among the sensors used to provide navigation information to ROVs. Currents, refraction, noise, and reverberation are some of the effects that interfere with accurate acoustic location.

USBL sensors calculate the position of an ROV by measuring its range and bearing from a transceiver on the launching vessel. DVLs have come down in size and price, and are now more common on smaller ROVs than they were even a few years ago. DVLs use multiple transceivers to measure velocity against the sea floor or columns of water, and use that data to correct and calculate absolute location. LBL requires the placement of sea floor transponders, and is usually confined to specific work areas.

Each sensor system has limitations, including dropped signals, rate drops, and simple errors. The more capable versions, particularly DVLs, can be expensive.

The challenge is to get more accuracy and utility out of existing onboard undersea navigation systems without significant additional cost.

Increasing resolution through sensor fusion

The response to the challenge of accurate navigation on a budget is a relatively inexpensive inertial navigation system (INS) that can work with one or more of the other navigation sensors to provide significantly improved accuracy without greatly increasing weight or power requirements. This fusion of sensor systems works by providing data from a variety of sensors so that each can serve as backup to the others, covering the blind spots that occur.

Inertial navigation via an inertial measurement unit (IMU) serves as the heart of the system, measuring orientation and acceleration, and thus providing a baseline value for position relative to starting point. But an inertial navigation system on its own is subject to drift. DVL can provide velocity data, and USBL and LBL systems position data. The result is extremely high resolution position and velocity determination, using existing sensors, at a reasonable cost. Sensor fusion also reduces the effects of inevitable sensor errors by resolving them with other data sources.

Sensor fusion also allows an ROV operator to leverage existing navigational assets. The end result is a far more capable, responsive, and accurate navigation system and ROV.

See sensor fusion in action

To learn about sensor fusion implementation using KVH’s 1750 IMU as the core processor of an integrated sensor navigation and control solution be sure to attend our free webinar:

“Realizing New Potentials in Miniature Subsea Robotics”
Hosted and moderated by IEEE
Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2016 at 2 pm EST

Speakers: Ben Kinnaman, CEO and President of Greensea Systems, Inc., and Sean McCormack, Director FOG & OEM Sales, KVH Industries, Inc.


About Chris Watson 92 Articles
Chris is the senior director of marketing for KVH Industries. A lifelong sailor and storyteller, he's a self-professed geek who finds all of this technical stuff fascinating.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.